<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chuck&#039;s Blog &#187; Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xtarutaru.com/category/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com</link>
	<description>Chuck&#039;s personal technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Slight bug when moving emails with GMail&#8217;s IMAP</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/08/31/slight-bug-when-moving-emails-with-gmails-imap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/08/31/slight-bug-when-moving-emails-with-gmails-imap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears there&#8217;s a bug, or maybe just a slight glitch, in Google&#8217;s IMAP implementation. Whenever messages are copied from a desktop IMAP client into GMail, the dates on the GMail web interface&#8217;s folder listing become out of sorts. This problem can be solved by importing mail using the POP3 importing feature, but I thought [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/08/31/slight-bug-when-moving-emails-with-gmails-imap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Facebook data at work</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/07/05/your-facebook-data-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/07/05/your-facebook-data-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Idle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3OH!3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skittles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this wonderful marketing information Facebook. I&#8217;ll be sure to let the corner stores know to put 3OH!3 albums nearby Skittles. On a side note: Page data is easily viewable by just about anyone on Facebook. See what can be determined with it? Correlation != Causation, but most people who like 3OH!3 honestly do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/07/05/your-facebook-data-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC to (hopefully) start classing broadband carriers as telcoms</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/06/17/fcc-finally-classing-broadband-carriers-as-telcoms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/06/17/fcc-finally-classing-broadband-carriers-as-telcoms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About time. Click here for a read. Two key paragraphs to notice: Industry stakeholders were quick to weigh in about the FCC vote. Many have charged that the proceeding is a backdoor way to write net neutrality rules without a congressional mandate. Such rules would prevent broadband providers from favoring certain Internet traffic. Changing broadband&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/06/17/fcc-finally-classing-broadband-carriers-as-telcoms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook page spamming &#8211; Count to 20,000</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/05/23/facebook-page-spamming-count-to-20000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/05/23/facebook-page-spamming-count-to-20000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 01:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoyance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly.. pyrohawk.com is the domain serving this page up, so if you&#8217;re annoyed with this too I&#8217;d go grab some info by running a whois query. Domain privacy was not used. I&#8217;m not the only one reporting on this. Hopefully Facebook does sort this out soon, because it has become quite the eyesore. Maybe a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/05/23/facebook-page-spamming-count-to-20000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google search page change &#8211; Ugh!</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/05/05/google-search-page-change-ugh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/05/05/google-search-page-change-ugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Google, why&#8230; This new layout will confuse me for months. *sigh*]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/05/05/google-search-page-change-ugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LogMeIn.com security?</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/02/26/logmein-com-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/02/26/logmein-com-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logmein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently had to play with LogMeIn.com&#8217;s services for a class, and began thinking about the service&#8217;s security. Yes, they state they use encryption. Yes, they provide the ability to use one time passwords. But are they really secure? I guess I am reluctant to trust third parties with access to my computers, but hey, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2010/02/26/logmein-com-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook privacy settings change</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/12/10/facebook-privacy-settings-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/12/10/facebook-privacy-settings-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, I&#8217;ll confess. I do have a Facebook account, even though I am a bit of a privacy nut. However, unlike most users I have employed the privacy settings to protect me from the average data mining theif. Although it looks like it&#8217;s about to get a bit harder for these folks to get the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/12/10/facebook-privacy-settings-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performing an HTTP benchmark with Apache bench (ab)</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/12/06/performing-a-http-benchmark-with-ab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/12/06/performing-a-http-benchmark-with-ab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ab (apache bench) is a command line program that comes with apache by default in most distributions. It allows one to run a quick and efficient test of how a server can handle a heavy load of clients. To use it simply run (as root) ab -n number_of_requests_to_try http://www.websiteyouwanttobenchmark.com/ Note that the trailing / is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/12/06/performing-a-http-benchmark-with-ab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC hits bloggers with a required discloser guideline</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/10/05/ftc-hits-bloggers-with-a-required-discloser-guideline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/10/05/ftc-hits-bloggers-with-a-required-discloser-guideline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Us bloggers pretty much have it made. We write our opinion about something and don&#8217;t really have to worry about the cost of the medium used to distribute it. Sure, 30$ USD per month is still a little bit of a bill for hosting services, but most bloggers have a solution to this: Advertising. Back [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/10/05/ftc-hits-bloggers-with-a-required-discloser-guideline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing users more likely to click ads?</title>
		<link>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/09/14/bing-users-more-likely-to-click-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/09/14/bing-users-more-likely-to-click-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtarutaru.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this analysis, Bing users are 50% more likely to click on advertisements. That&#8217;s cool and all, but how significant are these numbers? Currently my search engine traffic is split as follows this month (note: numbers are rounded to the nearest multiple of five) Google &#8211; 80% Yahoo &#8211; 5% Bing &#8211; 5% AOL [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/09/14/bing-users-more-likely-to-click-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
